Showing posts with label analytics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label analytics. Show all posts

Monday, April 14, 2008

Followup on the Webtrends Rant....

On my webtrends rant, Chris Grantski had issues with the fact that I complained about webtrends. Here are the twitter thread...



Why I sometimes just sit and wonder. User apparently misses whole sections of features then complains. http://tinyurl.com/68zbxl


Mymo's response:
That article is ROFLCOPTER funny. But sad too. But that is WT challenge, making their product so that this guy can use it.


Julien Coquet Answers
links to comic mocking us stupid non-technical guys :)


JeHawker responds
Agreed. WT has a learning curve and some usability issues. Blaming the user is not usually productive.


Chris G replies:

- i realize i blamed the user. I usually blame usability issues. But sometimes arrogance is just ... there.

Now now, my ego has been hurt. Someone has called me arrogant. He's actually right... I am arrogant, I just cover it with valuable content, and sometimes a rant is called for... While webtrends is extremely useful for enterprise level stuff, there is alot that does need to be improved.

It took over 10 hours of work sitting on the line with a tech rep from webtrends (3 actually) for my client, to find the problem among all of the settings. I also don't like the fact that the reports are way to general...

1) There's way too much work to file out a parameter and see the differences. For example, separating paid from natural search (unless it's because I'm too lazy to read all of the documentation... which I am. I do have it on my todo list...) I know where to break out parameters, and create a custom report... but it's just work. It's drop dead simple - and in beautiful pie and flow charts once it's created, but creating it is a hassle, and I need to be able to customize alot of things for different clients, with changing needs. It's a big time waster. I have done it in the past with clicktracks, and I think the process was a little simpler.


2) I just don't like their UI - I should be able to "get it" the way I "get" weblog analysis (fine, I don't), online marketing, and business strategy, without having a formal college education, or specializing in the field, and still charge my consulting fee (and without having to read the whole manual! I know, I know, I'm lazy)

Webtrends is a technical company, after all, it's software, but I think clicktracks has their butt kicked in the above areas, forget about their overlay onto the actual site, which I love (although clicktale has taken their concept to the next level.)

Chris, I do appreciate your input, and I'm actually looking forward to meeting you, as I see that you know a hell of alot more about web analytics than I do, but I think that webtrends has a ways to go...

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Microsoft tracking more factors that lead to the sale?

Mashable has an interesting post today that Microsoft is starting to Track Engagement in Online Advertising. It seems that Microsoft is aggressively hitting the online arena, and trying to compete with Google.

Since they've rolled out their own paid and organic search engine in (I think) 2005, they've been aggressively matching (and trying to beat Google) at the search game. They've built an impressive suite of tools for search marketers, introduced a free analytics tool to compete with Google analytics, and have now introduced the tracking of sales conversions in search to rich media...

I have issues with that whole concept, as you can see at cocomment, but on the whole Microsoft has alot of interesting stuff.

Poor Yahoo has been left out of the mix, as they have some great stuff too, including a search intent tool (which I admit that I haven't used much) released in 2005. They've released their smartads platform - which is behavioral targeting across their portals and (obviously) alot more...